Dana’s Strategic Shift: Raised Profit Targets Signal Confidence
24.01.2026 - 09:11:04The recent divestiture of its Off-Highway division marks a pivotal strategic realignment for Dana. This transaction, valued at an enterprise value of $2.7 billion, generated net proceeds of $2.4 billion. A significant portion of these funds—$1.9 billion—was immediately allocated to debt reduction. This decisive move raises a critical question for investors: is it sufficient to drive a lasting improvement in profitability? Management's response appears to be a confident yes, evidenced by its upwardly revised profit forecast for 2026 and heightened cost-saving targets.
Preliminary figures for 2025 came in at the upper end of expectations. The company reported revenue of approximately $7.5 billion. Adjusted EBITDA reached about $600 million, representing an 8% margin. Adjusted free cash flow, at roughly $315 million, surpassed prior projections. Dana also confirmed it achieved around $250 million in cost savings during the year.
Looking ahead, the company's 2026 outlook places a clear emphasis on margin expansion rather than top-line growth. Revenue is projected to remain stable in a range of $7.3 to $7.7 billion. However, the adjusted EBITDA margin target has been lifted to 10–11%, which corresponds to an EBITDA range of $750–850 million (using a midpoint of 10.5%). To support this ambition, the cost reduction goal for 2026 has been increased to $325 million, up from the previous target of $310 million.
Capital Allocation and Market Backlog
The sale has fundamentally strengthened Dana's balance sheet. The substantial $1.9 billion debt paydown enhances financial flexibility in the near term and reduces future interest expenses. Management states it will now sharpen its focus on higher-margin core operations.
This strategic focus is further reflected in Dana's capital return program. The company has a $1 billion shareholder return initiative in place. To date, $704 million has already been returned to shareholders, which includes the repurchase of 34 million shares.
Should investors sell immediately? Or is it worth buying Dana?
Additionally, Dana reports a three-year new business backlog worth $750 million. From this pipeline, the company anticipates approximately $200 million in incremental revenue during 2026.
Market Reaction and Analyst Response
The announcements were met with strong positive sentiment in the markets. Dana's shares surged more than 10% intraday, closing with a gain of 7.89% for the session. Over the past year, the stock has advanced an impressive 132.06% and was trading near its 52-week high of $31.73.
In reaction to the improved guidance, analysts at JPMorgan raised their price target on Dana to $28 from $26. The firm reaffirmed its Overweight rating, citing the enhanced EBITDA forecast as a key driver.
The Path Forward: Capital Markets Day
Investors can expect further details on Dana's strategic execution at an upcoming Capital Markets Day scheduled for March 25, 2026, in New York. Company leadership is expected to present a deeper dive into its long-term strategy, margin enhancement plans, and the roadmap for achieving its cost savings. Successful delivery on these announced targets would solidify the company's financial improvement, making the Capital Markets Day a crucial event for gauging future progress.
Key Financial Highlights:
- Off-Highway Sale: Enterprise Value $2.7B; Net Proceeds $2.4B.
- 2025 Results: Revenue ~$7.5B; Adj. EBITDA ~$600M (8% margin); Adj. Free Cash Flow ~$315M.
- 2026 Targets: Adj. EBITDA margin of 10–11% (~$750–850M); Revenue forecast $7.3–$7.7B.
- Cost Savings: 2026 target increased to $325M (from $310M).
- Shareholder Returns: $1B program; $704M already returned via buybacks (34M shares repurchased).
Ad
Dana Stock: Buy or Sell?! New Dana Analysis from January 24 delivers the answer:
The latest Dana figures speak for themselves: Urgent action needed for Dana investors. Is it worth buying or should you sell? Find out what to do now in the current free analysis from January 24.
Dana: Buy or sell? Read more here...


